Really Suggest Very little To somewhat of a National Gun Registry.

I was having a discussion with a buddy today who, although very liberal on most issues, is somewhat middle of the street when it comes to gun control. He’s not against concealed carry, but does favor a lot more background checks – especially on sales from a personal individual to private individual.

He’s a little surprised that I am against this. “Why?”, he asked.

First, i’d like to preface my reasoning with a little details about me. I am not an anarchist. I am not really a doomsday prepper. I do not believe we’re due for a revolution, most certainly not within my lifetime. I like having SOME government (don’t tell my anti-statist friends though). All of these beliefs being so, I must admit that I do fear for the generations that come after my death (I do hope to possess at least another 40 years, which would get me into my 80s).

So back once again to my friend. Why do I disagree with him? Well, it’s simple. Background checks on every sale, specifically private individual to private individual, would cause a nationwide gun registry. I am very much against having certainly one of these.

My friend countered, very proudly I would add, that we must register our cars. You will want to our guns? This really is simple. Nowhere in the constitution does it guarantee the proper to keep and own cars. Most of us caved on the licensing of cars and drivers of a 100 years ago.

Our founding fathers specifically put verbiage in the constitution allowing us to keep and bear arms. You will find different interpretations about what they meant, but I think at least part of the reasoning was so that we could protect ourselves from a tyrannical government or those who wish to accomplish us harm.

Do I think that our government is tyrannical? Well, not quite yet. STI Guns for sale We’re still the absolute most free nation on earth. I do nothing like to path our country is on, but I do not feel it’s to late to right the ship.

Having a national gun registry would cause forced gun buy-backs or even confiscation during some future crisis (either natural or man-made). Having our abilities to guard ourselves from criminals and/or government listed in a database could be sharing information that’s much too personal.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Government is good at making us genuinely believe that being safer (their definition) is worth stopping a few rights. Forcing people everywhere to register their private, constitutionally protected guns is a bad idea.

I could foresee that guns would even get linked with addresses where their owners no more live. What if you moved in to a home where the previous occupants had numerous guns registered and the authorities came trying to find those folks? Most of us know that police, a lot of them being great people, do make mistakes when their adrenaline levels are too high. Would you would like your house getting shot up because the previous residents had guns listed in the registry?

Throughout a so-called “state of emergency” you can bet some local, state or national governments would make a go on to take any weapons that did not reside in the hands of government personnel. It has recently happened. See the video below.

I believe it is none of the government’s business if I own a rifle (or guns). Yes, I need to do exactly the same background check as someone else when I purchase a new gun. But you think that having a national registry would keep guns out of the hands of men and women who couldn’t pass a background check? Not a chance. I think you would see a lot of gun owners reporting their guns stolen to be able to sell their guns to whomever they desire – just like they could now.

When times get bad, whose doors are agents of the federal government (police or military ) going to be knocking down when they go on their gun collection binges? I’ll let you know – the door’s which are on the addresses included in the gun registry.

While we do not already have a government that kicks in doors and gives gas showers or firing squads to people they don’t like, we do not know what our government will appear like in 50 or 100 years. I want my children and grandchildren to have the ability to defend themselves from both a tyrannical government or perhaps a homicidal maniac (I suppose they may be one and exactly the same though).

Starting a national gun registry is the first faltering step to taking guns from people the federal government does not need possessing guns. Currently this type of person felons and those with mental problems. Who might these future gunless people be? Individuals of particular political parties? Individuals of certain economic classes? Individuals of certain religions? It has all happened throughout world history. We pretend to function as enlightened Americans but we’ve factions looking to take all our freedoms and give all the ability to the federal government exactly like dictators of past and present we’ve all heard of.

So how exactly does this happen? We have to look at it from two avenues. First the gradual lack of gun rights for everyone through new “minor” restrictive gun laws. Second, the whole lack of gun rights for specific categories of people the federal government has targeted. Imagine a candle burning at both ends. As you end burns, more and more of the governments enemies are specifically forbidden to possess guns. As another end burns, more and more of the typical population are getting the rest of the gun rights recinded as well. When the flames meet in the centre we’re left with no guns for those who, and we’ve a government with nothing to fear. That is the nightmare of the slippery slope.

Leave a Reply